Friday, October 27, 2006

Lenten Entertainment

Rehearsals continue and my part in the play is getting bigger; or, to be more accurate, the number of small pointless roles I have is expanding. I am now playing no fewer than six people, with lines ranging from "Where will you have 'em burn sir?", a long-debated crux of thespian interpretation, to "Here's a letter come from your son, sir," the possibilities of which demand a thought and consideration which tax the amateur. I am also half of a brief dialogue scene in which I facilitate a husband role-playing the seduction of his own wife in the guise of a travelling hunter, and of another dialogue, my half of which consists purely of shouting 'Oh God, sir!" in increasingly hysterical tones. I am sorry to say that in both cases this is a good deal less sordid than it sounds. However, the former scene does involve acting a person who is acting, a remarkably difficult thing to do convincingly, and the latter involves acting someone with no personality, which is no doddle either. There is no denying that finding new and engaging ways to say "It pleases you to say so, sir" would confound the ingenuity of the most experienced and dedicated professionals.
In any case I had forgotten how much I like acting, and not just because of being around all the nice thespy types who tell me how much they like my shoes and say kind things about my accent. I spent a lot of time board-treading as a gel, but have scarcely been in a play since school, when the opening night of my star turn (ahem) as Lady Bracknell was marred by a less-than-word-perfect Jack Worthing. He fluffed my cue line, and thereby created the only performance in the history of The Importance of Being Earnest in which the line "A handbag?" was never in fact delivered. Oh, and there was the time I was roped into a One-Act play festival. Despite staging the worst-rehearsed show in the history of theatre, something about my portrayal of a bumptious uniformed Girl Guide-cum-secret Lesbian frotteuse seemed to appeal to the (old, male) adjudicator. Inexplicable.
Actually, my last foray was not at school but when I featured, rather successfully, in an intercollegiate drama competition in my first term at Oxford. It was definitely one to go out on: it was only a small role, and in a play so forgettable and so briefly and plainly named that I can't even find it on google; but it does make me one of few people who can honestly say they have been awarded a prize for their performance in Bed.

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i heard nothing about this the other night! i want all the details. after all i've dragged you through the banal pornography of my last foray onstage. "hoi, hoi, what's garn on ere then?" thank god for tonsilitis.

right, back to the essay i'm marking. the opening sentence? "during the reign of queen elizabeth, women were not tolerated in positions of power."

me: "let's weigh those two clauses against each other."

she: "what's a clause?"

2:30 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

how about, "shakespeare's texts produced the tune of the fabric of life itself"? (para 2)

I am not kidding.

make it go away

2:38 pm  
Blogger Scarlet said...

Dear God. The test I am marking is being sat as we speak, so let's hope for better.

5:14 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was in a seminar on medieval female mystics last week and we had to stop the discussion about one mystic's vision of a post-crucifixion Christ, so as to explain one of the (fourth year!) students, since she had never encountered it previously, the concept that the crucifixion of Christ was accomplished for the salvation of mankind. Returning to the mystic's account of her vision, the tutor asked why Christ had shown her His wounds, to which the newly enlightened student replied confidently, "Because the wounds are there to salvate us."

11:35 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home